<i>In vivo</i> cutaneous interferon‐γ gene delivery using novel dicationic (gemini) surfactant–plasmid complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Localized scleroderma (morphea and linear scleroderma) is a connective tissue disease, accompanied by excessive proliferation and deposition of collagen within the skin, inflammation, vasculopathy and a deranged immune system. Interferon gamma (IFNgamma), an inhibitor of collagen synthesis and an immunomodulator, could be a potential therapeutic agent if it could be delivered into or expressed locally in affected skin in a non-invasive manner. In this study, the feasibility of topical delivery of the IFNgamma gene and expression of IFNgamma were investigated in mice. METHODS: Novel dicationic (gemini) surfactant (spacer length n=2-16; alkyl chain m=12 or 16)-DNA complexes were formulated and characterized by circular dichroism and atomic force microscopy to select gemini analogues with the highest transfection efficiency (TE). Transfection and cellular expression of IFNgamma from the bicistronic pGTmCMV.IFN-GFP plasmid were evaluated in PAM 212 keratinocyte culture by ELISA and fluorescence microscopy. Topical delivery of plasmid using liposomal and nanoemulsion systems, based on gemini surfactant 16-3-16, was evaluated in mice by IFNgamma expression analysis. RESULTS: In vitro TE was found to be dependent on the spacer length of the gemini surfactant, with the C3 spacer showing the highest activity (both 12-3-12 and 16-3-16). Both gemini cationic liposomes and gemini nanoemulsion (3x25 microg DNA/animal) produced significantly higher levels of IFNgamma in the skin (359.4 and 607.24 pg/cm2) compared to naked DNA (135.69 pg/cm2) or a liposomal Dc-chol formulation (82.15 pg/cm2). IFNgamma expression in the lymph nodes was higher in the animals treated with gemini liposomes (422.74 pg/animal) compared to the nanoemulsion formulation (131.27 pg/animal) or the Dc-chol formulation (82pg/animal). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of topical delivery of pGTmCMV.IFN-GFP plasmid in mice using gemini cationic surfactant based delivery systems was demonstrated. IFNgamma expression after treatment with gemini-DNA formulations in the skin was 3-5-fold higher compared to the treatment with naked DNA (p<0.05), and 4-6-fold higher than the Dc-chol-DNA complex, indicating a significant advance in topical DNA delivery across intact skin in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".