Electrical remodeling in a transgenic mouse model of α<sub>1B</sub>-adrenergic receptor overexpression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac-specific overexpression of wild-type alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1B)-AR) in mice predisposes to dilated cardiomyopathy and sudden death. Although alpha-adrenergic stimulation is thought to contribute to induction of arrhythmias in heart failure, the electrophysiological consequences of chronic alpha(1)-adrenergic activation have not been clearly defined. Thus we characterized ventricular repolarization and monitored incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias in end-stage heart failure alpha(1B)-AR mice (9-12 mo) and younger alpha(1B)-AR mice (2-3 mo) that do not present signs of heart failure. Compared with aged-matched controls, the corrected QT interval was 34% longer in the 9- to 12-mo alpha(1B)-AR mice, and the action potential durations were also significantly prolonged in these mice. These changes were associated with a decrease in the density of the outward K(+) currents, Ca(2+)-independent transient, ultrarapid delayed rectifier, and steady state (at +30 mV, reduction of 68, 64, and 41%, respectively), and underlying K(+) channel expression. Electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings revealed that older alpha(1B)-AR mice exhibited spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias. The alterations in repolarization can contribute to these rhythm abnormalities and are likely caused by chronic alpha(1B)-AR activity. Additional data obtained in 2- to 3-mo alpha(1B)-AR mice clearly showed that electrical remodeling was already observed in younger transgenic animals. However, it appeared to be slightly less pronounced than in older mice. These results suggest that there are two waves of remodeling: one due to chronic alpha(1B)-AR activity, and a second due to heart failure. Taken together, these data provide strong evidence for a pathological role of chronic alpha(1B)-AR activity in the development of repolarization defects and ventricular arrhythmias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".