Stomatal characteristics of riparian poplar species in a semi-arid environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several native poplar species meet at the margins of their natural distributions in southern Alberta, Canada. In this semi-arid area, poplars are obligate riparian species but they occupy several intergrading ecoregions. Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh predominates in the warmest and driest eastern prairie ecoregions; P. balsamifera L. occupies the cooler and wetter western parkland and montane ecoregions; and P. angustifolia James and hybrids between the species occur in the intermediate grassland ecoregions. We investigated stomatal characteristics of these poplars in 51 genotypes collected across the range of ecoregions and grown in a semi-arid common garden. Stomatal length differed among genotypes within species but did not differ among species, ranging from 19 to 22 microm. Total stomatal densities (adaxial plus abaxial) differed among genotypes within species but were similar among species (290-420 stomata mm(-2)). Single-surface stomatal densities differed among species and consequently, the ratio of adaxial:abaxial stomatal density also differed, ranging from 0.94 for P. deltoides to 0.27 for P. balsamifera, with intermediate stomatal density ratios in P. angustifolia and hybrids. In a subsequent study of a subset of the same genotypes, stomatal density was correlated with stomatal conductance (r2 = 0.75) and the conductance ratios differed among species in the same manner as the stomatal density ratios. We conclude that: (1) diverse poplar genotypes respond similarly to a semi-arid environment by producing comparatively small and dense stomata; (2) differences in stomatal density underlie differences in stomatal conductance and differences among species in stomatal density ratio or conductance ratio may reflect adaptation to climatic differences among ecoregions; and (3) there is substantial variation in stomatal characteristics within and among species and hybrids in this area that could be useful for the selection and breeding of poplars adapted to different climatic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".