MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161808364 · doi:10.1111/2049-632x.12107

Draft genomes of 12 host-adapted and environmental isolates of<i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>and their positions in the core genome phylogeny

2013· article· en· W2161808364 on OpenAlexafffund
Lewis Stewart, A. A. Ford, Vartul Sangal, Julie Jeukens, Brian Boyle, Irena Kukavica‐Ibrulj, Shabhonam Caim, Lisa Crossman, Paul A. Hoskisson, Roger C. Lévesque, Nicholas P. Tucker

Bibliographic record

VenuePathogens and Disease · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilCystic Fibrosis CanadaUniversity of EdinburghSociety for General MicrobiologyUniversity of Strathclyde
KeywordsBiologyGenomeComparative genomicsPseudomonas aeruginosaIndelGenomicsGeneticsPhylogenetic treeHost adaptationPhylogeneticsEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen particularly associated with the inherited disease cystic fibrosis (CF). Pseudomonas aeruginosa is well known to have a large and adaptable genome that enables it to colonise a wide range of ecological niches. Here, we have used a comparative genomics approach to identify changes that occur during infection of the CF lung. We used the mucoid phenotype as an obvious marker of host adaptation and compared these genomes to analyse SNPs, indels and islands within near-isogenic pairs. To commence the correction of the natural bias towards clinical isolates in genomics studies and to widen our understanding of the genomic diversity of P. aeruginosa, we included four environmental isolates in our analysis. Our data suggest that genome plasticity plays an important role in chronic infection and that the strains sequenced in this study are representative of the two major phylogenetic groups as determined by core genome SNP analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePathogens and DiseaseSame topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFrench-language works237,207