<i>N</i>-OXIDATION OF DRUGS ASSOCIATED WITH IDIOSYNCRATIC DRUG REACTIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Circumstantial evidence strongly suggests that most idiosyncratic drug reactions are due to reactive metabolites of drugs rather than due to the drugs themselves. Many of the drugs that are associated with idiosyncratic drug reactions contain nitrogen. There are many possible reasons for this association. One is simply that many drugs, especially CNS active drugs, contain nitrogen. In addition, nitrogen is relatively easy to oxidize because of its lone pair of electrons and many nitrogen-containing compounds readily undergo redox cycling, which can generate reactive oxygen species. There are several nitrogen-containing function groups that are especially associated with adverse reactions. These include aromatic amines, nitro compounds (nitro compounds are reduced to the same reactive intermediates as are formed by oxidation of the corresponding aromatic amine), hydrazines and compounds that can be oxidized to iminoquinone and related compounds. A greater attention to the issue of reactive metabolites during drug development would likely lead to safer drugs; however, not all drugs that form reactive metabolites are associated with a high incidence of idiosyncratic drug reactions. In addition to the presence of such a group, other factors, such as dose and electron density of the compound, appear to play a role in whether the drug containing such functional groups will be associated with a relatively high incidence of idiosyncratic drug reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".