Effect of estrogen replacement treatment on ischemic preconditioning in isolated rat hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, we tested the effects of long-term estrogen replacement treatment on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and on the cardioprotection of ischemic preconditioning in isolated hearts from ovariectomized rats. Ovariectomized rats were treated with 17beta-estradiol (30 micro g/kg/d, s.c.) for 12 weeks. Isolated rat hearts were perfused in the Langendorff mode. Heart rate, coronary flow, left ventricular pressure and its first derivative (+/-LVdp/dtmax) were recorded. Fifteen-min global ischemia and 30-min reperfusion caused a significant decrease of cardiac mechanical function, which were not affected by ovariectomy or estrogen replacement treatment. The isolated hearts in all groups could be preconditioned, and the cardioprotection afforded by preconditioning in the sham-operated rats was greater compared with ovariectomized rats with or without estrogen treatment. These results suggest that long-term estrogen replacement treatment exerts no effect on the inhibition of mechanical function after ischemia-reperfusion, and this study also suggests that estrogen does not affect ischemic preconditioning in isolated hearts of ovariectomized rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".