Larval development and metamorphic transformation of the feeding system in the kleptoparasitic snail<i>Trichotropis cancellata</i>(Mollusca, Caenogastropoda)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trichotropis cancellata Hinds, 1849 has a planktonic larval stage that feeds on microalgae and a benthic stage that feeds both by ctenidial suspension feeding and by stealing food ("kleptoparasitism") from several species of suspension-feeding, tube-dwelling polychaete worms. We used scanning electron microscopy, histological sections, and observations on live animals to document the sequence and timing of morphogenetic events during larval and metamorphic development of T. cancellata. These data were compared with other accounts of gastropod development to test for differences in the timing of developmental events among feeding larvae of two major gastropod clades: the caeno gastropods and heterobranchs. In T. cancellata, as in feeding larvae of previously studied caenogastropods, components of the post-metamorphic body plan differentiate at an earlier stage of larval development (relative to times of hatching and ability to undergo metamorphosis) than in feeding heterobranch larvae. Metamorphosis of T. cancellata was induced by polychaete hosts of this snail's kleptoparasitic benthic stage, and young juveniles of T. cancellata could steal food from these polychaetes within a day after snail metamorphosis began. Rapid onset of kleptoparasitic feeding following metamorphosis of T. cancellata was permitted by development of a specialized feeding structure, the pseudo proboscis, during the larval stage. This novel embellishment of larval development was likely preceded during evolution by selective larval induction by polychaete hosts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".