Cushing's Syndrome Induced by Misuse of Moderate- to High-Potency Topical Corticosteroids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of Cushing's syndrome caused by continuous use of moderate- to high-potency topical corticosteroids over several months. CASE SUMMARY: An 11-month-old patient with atopic dermatitis received uninterrupted treatment with moderate- to high-potency topical corticosteroids. He presented with several food allergies and was admitted to the hospital after atopic dermatitis worsened. Signs of growth retardation, which had begun at 6 months of age, were also noted during the child's hospital stay. An endocrinologist concluded that a lower-than-normal bone density scan and growth retardation on both weight and growth curves were due to suppression of the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and a multifactorial failure to thrive. DISCUSSION: This is a case of an infant overexposed to topical corticosteroid treatment who developed Cushing's syndrome within a few months. Local treatment of atopic dermatitis is classically based on the use of topical corticosteroids in combination with an emollient or other drugs. To limit local and general damaging effects, the choice of topical corticosteroid must be made in terms of patient age, severity and site of the rash, and the extent of skin involvement. Several factors influence the systemic absorption of topical corticosteroids. While our literature review indicated the possibility of a multifactorial origin of the child's growth retardation, the use of topical corticosteroids was shown to have contributed to suppression of the HPA axis. Application of the Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between the continuous and sustained administration of topical corticosteroids over several months and suppression of the HPA axis. Although topical corticosteroids are widely used and can be perceived by parents and patients to be safe, daily documentation of agents used and body surfaces exposed should be done during long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous use of moderate- to high-potency topical corticosteroids over several months can contribute to Cushing's syndrome. Growth and development as well as cortisol levels should be monitored in children on long-term topical corticosteroid treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".