A computational study of the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction mechanism for nitrilimines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The [3+2] and [1+2] cycloaddition pathways between ethene and a series of 13 nitrilimines (R 1 CNNR 2 ) have been examined by density functional theory [PBE0/6-311++G(2df,pd)] calculations. All reactions have low barriers ranging from 14.14 (R 1 = CH 3 , R 2 = H) to 1.01 (R 1 = R 2 = F) kcal mol 1 , and large reaction exothermicities consistent with the transient nature of nitrilimines. The [3+2] and [1+2] transition-state structures are very similar, mainly differing in the relative orientation of their fragments and the newly forming CC bond distance, and exhibit only minor deviations from the structures of the reactants. Both reaction pathways are concerted and asynchronous, but the [1+2] reaction has a greater degree of asynchronicity. Examination of the frontier molecular orbitals reveals that both the [3+2] and [1+2] barrier heights are related to two sets of orbital interactions, with the interaction between the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital π [Formula: see text] of nitrilimine and the highest occupied molecular orbital of ethene in common. The second interaction in both cases is carbene-like. A relationship between the weights of the 1,3-dipolar resonance contribution in the various nitrilimines and the corresponding [3+2] barrier heights was not found, but a good correlation could be found between the [1+2] barrier heights and both the 1,3-dipolar and carbene contributions. Inspection of the potential energy surface in the vicinity of the two transition states for the reaction between unsubstituted nitrilimine and ethene suggests that the observed [3+2] product is a result of an initial carbene-like approach of the two fragments followed by a ridge bifurcation that leads to the [3+2] product minimum. Key words: nitrilimines, 1,3-dipole, carbene, [3+2] cycloaddition, [1+2] cycloaddition, density functional theory (DFT).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".