3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-COA Reductase Inhibitors and Phosphodiesterase Type V Inhibitors Attenuate Right Ventricular Pressure and Remodeling in a Rat Model of Pulmonary Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We examined the inhibitory effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitors and a phosphodiesterase type V inhibitor on hemodynamic function and cardiac remodeling in rats with monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: The rat model of pulmonary hypertension was created by administration of monocrotaline (70 mg/kg, s.c.) to male Wistar rats. A polyethylene tube was introduced into a femoral artery for measurement of mean arterial pressure, another into the right ventricle via the right jugular vein for measurement of right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), and another into a femoral vein for administration of test drugs. RESULTS: Repeated administration of atorvastatin (2 mg/kg/day, p.o. 0 - 28 days) and simvastatin (2 mg/kg/day, p.o. 0 - 28 days) significantly reduced RVSP and right ventricular weight (RV)/left ventricular + septum weight (LV + S) without a change in heart rate. However, repeated administration of pravastatin (4 mg/kg/day, p.o. 0 - 28 days) did not reduce the monocrotaline-induced elevation of RVSP and RV/(LV + S) significantly. The reduction of RVSP and RV/(LV + S)) induced by a combination of a prostacyclin analogue, beraprost (100 mg/kg/day, 0 - 28 days) and simvastatin (2 mg/kg/day, 0 - 28 days), was more potent than the effect induced by each drug alone. Sildenafil (5 mg/kg/day, 0 - 28 days) tended to reduce RVSP and RV/(LV + S). Repeated combined administration of atorvastatin (2 mg/kg/day, p.o. 0 - 28 days) + sildenafil (5 mg/kg/day, p.o. 0 - 28 days) significantly reduced Lung/BW. CONCLUSION: Our present results suggest that repeated administration of the lipophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin and simbastatin, selectively attenuates the elevation of RVSP, development of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular remodeling in rats with monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension, and that a combination of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and beraprost has a more potent effect than each agent alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".