Mineral nutrient concentration influences sunflower infection by broomrape (<i>Orobanche cumana</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orobanche cumana Wallr., a root parasitic angiosperm, causes severe yield losses in Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower) in Europe. Until now, the only effective method of controlling this parasite has been the use of resistant sunflower genotypes. Broomrape resistance is, however, poorly understood even though previous studies have revealed several defence mechanisms. The study of a susceptible (2603) and a resistant (LR1) sunflower genotype in hydroponic co-culture showed that the degree of infection by broomrape is influenced by the concentration of nutrients in the growth medium. For the susceptible genotype, an increase in broomrape necrosis was observed when the nutrient concentration was increased. In the resistant genotype LR1, the rate of infection was reduced by increasing the concentration of mineral nutrients, measured as a decrease in broomrape attachments and a lack of underground stem development. When sunflowers were cultivated in full-strength medium, these findings correlated with a lower 14 C incorporation in broomrape and a change in carbon allocation to host plant organs with a reinforced “shoot apex sink strength”. Results demonstrated that in controlled conditions, the nutrient concentration directly affects sunflower resistance potential towards broomrape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".