Activation of cardiac AMP-activated protein kinase by LKB1 expression or chemical hypoxia is blunted by increased Akt activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) plays a major role in the regulation of cardiac energy substrate utilization and can be negatively regulated by Akt activation in the heart. It has recently been shown that Akt directly phosphorylates AMPKalpha(1)/alpha(2) on Ser(485/491) in vitro and prevents the AMPK kinase (AMPKK) LKB1 from phosphorylating AMPKalpha at its primary activation site, Thr(172) (S Horman, D Vertommen, R Heath, D Neumann, V Mouton, A Woods, U Schlattner, T Wallimann, D Carling, L Hue, and MH Rider. J Biol Chem 281: 5335-5340, 2006). To determine whether this is also the case in the cardiac myocyte, neonatal rat cardiac myocytes (NRCM) were infected with a recombinant adenovirus expressing a constitutively active mutant of Akt1 (myrAkt1) and then with or without adenoviruses expressing the active LKB1 complex. Expression of myrAkt1 blunted LKB1-induced phosphorylation of AMPKalpha at Thr(172), which resulted in a dramatic decrease in phosphorylation of AMPK's target, acetyl CoA-carboxylase. This decrease in AMPK activity was associated with prior Akt1-dependent phosphorylation of AMPKalpha(1)/alpha(2) at Ser(485/491). To investigate whether Akt1 activation was also able to prevent other AMPKKs from phosphorylating AMPKalpha, we subjected NRCM to chemical hypoxia and noted a marked increase in phosphorylation of AMPKalpha at Thr(172), despite no change in LKB1 activity. NRCM expressing myrAkt1 demonstrated increased phosphorylation of AMPKalpha(1)/alpha(2) at Ser(485/491) and a complete inhibition of chemical hypoxia-induced phosphorylation of AMPKalpha at Thr(172). Taken together, our data show that activation of Akt1 is able to prevent activation of cardiac AMPK by LKB1 and at least one other AMPKK, likely by prior phosphorylation of AMPKalpha(1)/alpha(2) at Ser(485/491).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".