MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162157332 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.100687

Salivary Gland Swelling in Wegener’s Granulomatosis: A Rare Cause of a Frequent Symptom

2010· letter· en· W2162157332 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Volker Gaßling, Jörg Wiltfang, Jochen Hampe, Jan Hinrich Bräsen, Marcus Both, Frank Moosig

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineErythrocyte sedimentation rateMagnetic resonance imagingSubmandibular glandSalivary glandSialographyPathologyParotid glandSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG) is a multisystemic disease with a complex genetic background. The clinical presentation is characterized by necrotizing granulomatous inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tract, glomerulonephritis, and small-vessel vasculitis1. We describe an unusual primary manifestation of WG with salivary gland swelling. A 68-year-old man who was admitted to the hospital presented with progressive swellings of his right cheek and bilateral submandibular space over a period of several weeks. Extraoral examination revealed a bilateral enlargement of both submandibular glands and the right parotid gland, which were solid, plain, and painless to pressure (Figure 1.1). The oral cavity showed no pathologies of the mucosa, and no putrid secretion from the Stenon’s duct was determined. His history was notable for eye complications with dryness and reddening, ear complaints with bilateral hearing impairment, severe headache, night sweats, muscular weakness, and weight loss of about 8 kg during the 6 weeks before presentation. Blood tests revealed increased values for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (110/115 mm), C-reactive protein (203.7 mg/l), and leukocytes (13.18/nl). On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the right parotid gland and the submandibular glands were enlarged, demonstrating low signal intensity in T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging … Address correspondence to Dr. V. Gassling, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Strasse 3, Haus 26, 24105 Kiel, Germany. E-mail: gassling{at}mkg.uni-kiel.de

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0120.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207