The Landscape of Nucleotide Polymorphism among 13,500 Genes of the Conifer Picea glauca, Relationships with Functions, and Comparison with Medicago truncatula
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gene families differ in composition, expression, and chromosomal organization between conifers and angiosperms, but little is known regarding nucleotide polymorphism. Using various sequencing strategies, an atlas of 212k high-confidence single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a validation rate of more than 92% was developed for the conifer white spruce (Picea glauca). Nonsynonymous and synonymous SNPs were annotated over the corresponding 13,498 white spruce genes representative of 2,457 known gene families. Patterns of nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed by estimating the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous numbers of substitutions per site (A/S). A general excess of synonymous SNPs was expected and observed. However, the analysis from several perspectives enabled to identify groups of genes harboring an excess of nonsynonymous SNPs, thus potentially under positive selection. Four known gene families harbored such an excess: dehydrins, ankyrin-repeats, AP2/DREB, and leucine-rich repeat. Conifer-specific sequences were also generally associated with the highest A/S ratios. A/S values were also distributed asymmetrically across genes specifically expressed in megagametophytes, roots, or in both, harboring on average an excess of nonsynonymous SNPs. These patterns confirm that the breadth of gene expression is a contributing factor to the evolution of nucleotide polymorphism. The A/S ratios of Medicago truncatula genes were also analyzed: several gene families shared between P. glauca and M. truncatula data sets had similar excess of synonymous or nonsynonymous SNPs. However, a number of families with high A/S ratios were found specific to P. glauca, suggesting cases of divergent evolution at the functional level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".