MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2162198724 · doi:10.1242/jeb.01945

EXCITOTOXIC CELL DEATH DENIED

2005· article· en· W2162198724 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jonathan A. W. Stecyk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNMDA receptorPainted turtleNeuroscienceBiologyTurtle (robot)IntracellularExcitotoxicityGlutamate receptorProgrammed cell deathCell damageDepolarizationReceptorCell biologyEndocrinologyBiochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most vertebrates' brains die within minutes when deprived of molecular oxygen (anoxia), mainly due to excitotoxic cell death (ECD). ECD begins with a massive and uncontrolled influx of Ca2+ into neurons by over-stimulation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors(NMDARs), resulting in the activation of Ca2+-dependent phospholipases and proteases that cause membrane depolarisation, uncontrolled cellular swelling and, ultimately, cell death. Some ectothermic vertebrates,such as the western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii), are remarkably anoxia tolerant and can survive days to months without oxygen and recover without any apparent brain damage. One mechanism that is believed to enable these animals to accomplish such a feat is their ability to prevent ECD by reducing NMDAR activity during anoxia. However, the mechanisms underlying the attenuation of turtle brain NMDAR activity have not been fully elucidated.Thomas Buck's team at the University of Toronto was determined to tease out how NMDAR activity is reduced in the turtle brain during anoxia. In order to do so, Buck's team obtained cortical slices from painted turtles' brains and used whole-cell patch clamp techniques to measure NMDAR currents from individual cortical neurons during normoxia and after 0, 20 and 40 min of anoxic exposure. As they expected, the team confirmed that turtle neuronal NMDAR activity is reduced during anoxia; during the 40-min anoxic period they observed a 56% decrease in whole-cell NMDAR currents from normoxic levels.To discover which intracellular modulators are responsible for this reduction of neuronal NMDAR activity, the team pharmacologically blocked possible modulators of NMDAR activity in the turtles' brains and again measured NMDAR currents from neurons in normoxic and anoxic experiments. Suspecting that protein phosphatases play a role, the team incubated the turtles' cortical slices in inhibitors of serine/threonine protein phosphatases PP1 and 2A and found they could abolish the anoxia-induced reduction in NMDAR currents. To test the role of intracellular Ca2+, they added the calcium chelator BAPTA to the recording electrode solution (which is continuous with the cytoplasm in whole-cell patch clamp experiments) and found that this also abolished the reduction in NMDAR currents. This indication that intracellular Ca2+ modulates NMDAR activity led the team to wonder about the role of calmodulin, an intermediary protein that senses calcium levels and relays signals to various calcium-sensitive enzymes, ion channels and other proteins. Sure enough, when the team pharmacologically blocked calmodulin during anoxia, they did not see a reduction in NMDAR current, indicating that calmodulin also controls NMDAR activity. The team concluded that protein phosphatases PP1 and 2A,intracellular Ca2+ and calmodulin all work in concert to decrease NMDAR activity during anoxia.Synthesizing their findings with previously published data, the team proposes a novel mechanism of how NMDAR activity is attenuated during anoxia. The team suggests that during anoxia, protein phosphatases PP1 and 2A dephosphorylate the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR receptor. Dephosphorylation of the NMDAR receptor subsequently enables calmodulin, which must first be activated by Ca2+, to bind to the receptor and disrupt NMDAR binding to α-actinin-2, a molecule that normally connects the NMDAR receptor to the cytoskeleton. Disruption of this connection results in the dissociation of the NMDAR from the cytoskeleton, ultimately leading to a decrease in receptor activity and prevention of ECD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→