Increases in Homocysteine Are Related to Worsening of Stroop Scores in Healthy Elderly Persons: A Prospective Follow-Up Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elevated blood levels of homocysteine have been associated with cerebrovascular disease and cognitive impairment. The authors' objective was to determine the relationship between cognitive changes and variations in tHcy levels over time in healthy elderly volunteers. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted in healthy community-dwelling older adults without cerebrovascular disease at baseline and followed them for 2.3 years. Cobalamin, red blood cell folate, total serum homocysteine (tHcy), and creatinine levels were measured and recorded. Cognitive measures included the Mini Mental State Examination, California Verbal Learning Test, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, and Stroop Neuropsychological Inventory. RESULTS: At baseline, participants with elevated tHcy levels had lower Stroop scores (72.7 vs 85.35, p <.05) than did participants with normal tHcy levels. The tHcy levels correlated significantly with Stroop scores at baseline and follow-up. At follow-up, tHcy levels had increased in 104 participants (group I) and decreased in 76 participants (group II). Compared to mean baseline values, the mean tHcy in both groups had changed significantly at follow-up (p <.05 and p <.001, respectively). Participants in group I had significantly lower Stroop scores in multivariate analyses at follow-up than at baseline. The scores of participants in group II at follow-up were not significantly different than their scores at baseline. The rate of change of tHcy levels and the rate of change of the Stroop scores were significantly correlated (r = -0.264, p <.001) after multivariate analysis. Stroop scores decreased by 22% at follow-up in participants whose tHcy levels increased by 40% from baseline to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Elevated tHcy levels and increases in tHcy during a short period of time are associated with decreased Stroop scores in otherwise cognitively normal elderly volunteers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".