Trapping and characterization of covalent intermediates of mutant retaining glycosyltransferases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The enzymatic mechanism by which retaining glycosyltransferases (GTs) transfer monosaccharides with net retention of the anomeric configuration has, so far, resisted elucidation. Here, direct detection of covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediates for mutants of two model retaining GTs, the human blood group synthesizing α-(1 → 3)-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (GTA) and α-(1 → 3)-galactosyltransferase (GTB) mutants, by mass spectrometry (MS) is reported. Incubation of mutants of GTA or GTB, in which the putative catalytic nucleophile Glu(303) was replaced with Cys (i.e. GTA(E303C) and GTB(E303C)), with their respective donor substrate results in a covalent intermediate. Tandem MS analysis using collision-induced dissociation confirmed Cys(303) as the site of glycosylation. Exposure of the glycosyl-enzyme intermediates to a disaccharide acceptor results in the formation of the corresponding enzymatic trisaccharide products. These findings suggest that the GTA(E303C) and GTB(E303C) mutants may operate by a double-displacement mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".