MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162342078 · doi:10.1109/icmens.2004.1508923

Preliminary Results of Nanopharmaceuticals Used in the Radioimmunotherapy of Ovarian Cancer

2006· article· en· W2162342078 on OpenAlexaff
S.A. McQuarrie, Gerald G. Miller, M.R. Suresh, John R. Mercer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioimmunotherapyMonoclonal antibodyOvarian cancerCancer researchBiotinylationIn vivoEpitopeCytotoxic T cellPretargetingRadionuclide therapyAdjuvantMedicinePharmacologyChemistryCancerAntibodyBiologyImmunologyInternal medicineIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The treatment of late stage ovarian cancer presents an unmet clinical need for women around the world. A multistep radioimmunotherapeutic (RIT) approach, exploiting the combination of a bispecific monoclonal antibody (BsMAb) with 90Y labelled biotinylated long-circulating liposomes was tested as a potential adjuvant treatment for epithelial ovarian carcinomatosis in an attempt to meet this need. This approach was used to overcome some of the major obstacles associated with conventional strategies, in particular, to increase the amount of radioactivity delivered to the tumor site compared with conventional monoclonal antibody (MAb) radionuclide delivery. We hypothesize that sequential intraperitoneal administration of the targeting and therapeutic moieties provides the basis for an enhanced therapeutic ratio. METHODS: A BsMAb, with anti-CA 125 and anti-biotin epitopes was engineered for use with PEGylated liposomes coated with biotin to deliver the cytotoxic radionuclide 90Y to tumor sites. An in vivo therapy trial was used to test this RIT protocol with Balb/c nude mice (n=29) xenografted with the NIH:OVCAR-3 (CA 125+) human ovarian cancer cell line. RESULTS: A median tumor growth delay of 91 days for the combined treatment group versus 77.7 days for the control group was observed. CONCLUSION: An ongoing tumor growth delay/control study using this model has indicated an appreciable delay in progress of tumor and ascites development in treated vs. control populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207