A New Evaluation Method for Surface Finish of Composite Automotive Panels Using Waveform Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The surface finish of composite plates made using Resin Transfer Molding of glass/polyester is studied. A surface profilometer is used to measure the surface profile and to record raw data. The objective is to develop an objective method (rather than using human judgment) to differentiate the quality of one surface from another. Initially commonly used current techniques are utilized to assess the quality of the surface finish. These include subjective evaluation through a survey of observations from a group of people; the use of the average amplitude of the signals, frequency analysis, and filtering. For surfaces that have approximate quality, human visual observation can differentiate the quality between the surfaces, but the objective methods (average amplitude, frequency spectrum, and filtering) cannot. A new objective technique is found to be able to distinguish surfaces of approximate quality. This uses the comparison between the parameters of a reference good surface to those of the surface under consideration. A comparative index can be obtained to indicate the degree of similarity between the surface under study and the reference (good) surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it