Zonisamide reduces obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised placebo-controlled study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbonic anhydrase inhibition reduces apnoeic events in sleep disordered breathing. Zonisamide inhibits carbonic anhydrase, and induces weight loss in obese patients. This study explored the relative influence of these two properties, which may both alleviate obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used as a standard care comparator. 47 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA and a body mass index of 27-35 kg·m(-2) were randomised to receive either zonisamide, placebo or CPAP for 4 weeks. The open extension phase (20 weeks) compared CPAP and zonisamide. Polysomnography, biochemistry and symptoms were evaluated. At 4 weeks, zonisamide reduced apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) by a mean±sd 33±39% and oxygen desaturation index by 28±31% (p=0.02 and 0.014, respectively; placebo adjusted). The mean compliance adjusted reduction of AHI after zonisamide and CPAP was 13 and 61%, respectively, (p=0.001) at 24 weeks. Body weight was marginally changed at 4 weeks, but reduced after zonisamide and increased after CPAP at 24 weeks (-2.7±3.0 kg versus 2.3±2.0 kg, p<0.001). Zonisamide decreased bicarbonate at 4 and 24 weeks. Side-effects were more common after zonisamide. Zonisamide reduced OSA independent of body weight potentially by mechanisms related to carbonic anhydrase inhibition. The effect was less pronounced than that obtained by CPAP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".