MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162451701 · doi:10.2217/imt.14.7

Alemtuzumab for the Treatment of Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

2014· review· en· W2162451701 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carrie M. Hersh, Jeffrey Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunotherapy · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlemtuzumabRelapsing remittingMultiple sclerosisMedicineFingolimodOncologyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD52, was recently approved in the EU and Canada for the treatment of patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Alemtuzumab induces rapid depletion of circulating B- and T-lymphocytes followed by repopulation that leads to a distinctive lymphocyte profile, including an increased proportion of regulatory T-lymphocytes and memory B- and T-lymphocytes. In early open-label studies, alemtuzumab treatment reduced the number of clinical relapses and new MRI lesions in participants with secondary progressive MS. However, most participants had continued worsening of disability, which led to the evaluation of alemtuzumab in patients with early stages of disease in the Genzyme (MA, USA)-sponsored clinical development program in MS. In one Phase II and two Phase III trials, alemtuzumab reduced the number of clinical relapses versus the active comparator, subcutaneous IFN-β-1a, in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Two of these trials showed reduction in risk of confirmed worsening of disability, and all showed reduction in cerebral atrophy. Safety issues include infusion reactions that are mitigated by pretreatment with corticosteroids in addition to symptomatic management with antihistamines; mild to moderate infections; and autoimmune adverse events. In this context, post-marketing risk mitigation strategies will be needed so that potential adverse events can be identified and managed early and effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunotherapySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207