MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162457813 · doi:10.7202/006854ar

Late Wisconsinan Sedimentation in the Québec City Region: Evidence for Energetic Subaqueous Fan Deposition During Initial Deglaciation

2003· article· en· W2162457813 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Don I. Cummings, Serge Occhietti

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyDeglaciationMeltwaterGeomorphologyOutwash plainFluvialMudflowSlumpingDiamictiteDebrisGeochemistryIce sheetGlacierStructural basinGlacial periodOceanographyFaciesLandslide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the St. Lawrence Valley just west of Québec City, initial deglaciation was accompanied by an energetic northward discharge of meltwater into a body of water, possibly subglacial, that was present in the axis of the valley. At Pointe Saint-Nicolas, a thick (> 35 m) ice-proximal sandy subaqueous fan was deposited during this event. The subaqueous fan is composed primarily of northwest-dipping turbidite sheets, with minor hyperconcentrated underflow channel fills and gravel-outwash deposits. By 11 200 14C BP, subaqueous fan sedimentation had stopped, and massive to rhythmically interbedded glaciomarine muds were being deposited. Introduction of muds into the basin promoted subaqueous slope failure and debris flowing locally. Between 10 950 and 10 800 14C BP, the Laurentide Ice Sheet readvanced southward onto the south shore, and deposited the subglacial St. Nicolas Till. With continued isostatic rebound and associated forced regression, tidal currents began to rework emergent coastal zones, and fluvial systems started to incise their valleys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207