Insights into the evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploids from<i>Gossypium</i>This paper is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Systematics Research.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyploidy is a prominent mechanism of speciation in plants that can lead to novel phenotypes. Polyploidy is characterized by novel genetic and genomic consequences that provide raw material for morphological evolution. Polyploids often exhibit changes in genome organization and gene expression compared with their diploid progenitors. The five allopolyploid cotton (Gossypium) species and newly created cotton neopolyploids have been developed as a useful group for studies of duplicated gene expression in polyploids. Here I review recent studies on the evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploid cotton. In addition I present new expression data from cotton neopolyploids that address the effects on expression of adding a third genome in an allohexaploid, and that provide insights into fine scale organ-specific silencing. Substantial changes in gene expression have occurred in homoeologous genes (gene pairs duplicated by polyploidy), including organ-specific gene silencing and subfunctionalization. Many of the changes in gene expression have occurred on an evolutionary timescale, whereas others occur immediately after genome merger and within a few generations. Abiotic stress can affect the expression of homoeologous gene expression, causing expression partitioning between homoeologs. To examine the effects of interspecific hybridization, without chromosome doubling, on gene expression, interspecific hybrids have been studied. Extensive variation in allelic expression was observed upon hybridization that varied by gene, organ, and genotype. Several hypotheses have been proposed for why gene expression is altered in allopolyploids and interspecific hybrids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it