MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162618988 · doi:10.1109/icsens.2010.5690140

A variable topology partitioned pixel amplifier for low and high light level detection in a CMOS imager

2010· article· en· W2162618988 on OpenAlexafffund
Yonathan Dattner, Orly Yadid-Pecht

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsReset (finance)AmplifierPixelComputer scienceCMOSElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Noise (video)Electrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work the concept of using a single partitioned pixel amplifier with variable topology for both low light level operation and Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) for CMOS imagers is presented. Low light level imaging is based on the Active Reset (AR) technique combined with the Active Column Sensor (ACS) readout technique for low noise operation. WDR for high light level detection is achieved by utilizing multiple resets via real-time feedback where each pixel in the field of view is independent and can automatically set an exposure time according to its illumination. Due to the commonalities in the low and high light level readout techniques, and the fact that they occur in staggered instances of time, we propose the use of a single column level partitioned pixel amplifier which can be configured in various modes of operation to satisfy the conditions for the suggested techniques. We also propose a Conditional Active Reset (CAR) scheme in which an AR is employed for every reset in the multiple-reset WDR algorithm, thereby reducing the overall noise involved in the technique. The advantages of the proposed column level partitioned pixel amplifier are simplicity in the analog readout path, reduced chip size and less power consumption. The Variable Topology Amplifier was designed and simulated in a mixed signal 0.18 um CMOS technology. Its design is discussed and simulation results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207