MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Systematic Review of Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents and Adults with Cystic Fibrosis

2015· review· en· W2162681613 on OpenAlexaff
Al‐Rahim Habib, Jamil Manji, Pearce Wilcox, Amin R. Javer, Jane A. Buxton, Bradley S. Quon

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaInstitute of Population and Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCINAHLMEDLINEQuality of life (healthcare)Cystic fibrosisLife expectancyExacerbationGerontologyBody mass indexPopulationSocioeconomic statusInternal medicinePsychological interventionPsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: As the life expectancy for individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) continues to improve, an emphasis on optimizing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become increasingly important. The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R 14+) is the most widely accepted method to quantify HRQoL in this patient population. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to systematically review the literature to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with HRQoL among adolescents and adults with CF. METHODS: Five major literature databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, psychINFO) to identify studies published from January 1989 to April 2014 (n=1,921). We included all full-text studies that: (1) focused on individuals 14 years of age or older, and (2) examined the relationship between sociodemographic (age, sex, body-mass index [BMI], socioeconomic status, and employment) and clinical (FEV1 % predicted, pulmonary exacerbation, comorbidities) factors with the CFQ-R 14+. Effect estimates and levels of statistical significance in the association between sociodemographic and clinical factors with each of the 12 CFQ-R 14+ domains were analyzed, if examined in at least two studies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles met our inclusion/exclusion criteria, but 5 studies were excluded at the data synthesis stage, leaving 23 articles for analysis. In relation to the CFQ-R 14+, 10 candidate factors were examined in at least two studies. The five most commonly studied factors were FEV1 % predicted (57.1% of 28 studies), sex (32.1%), BMI (28.6%), age (17.6%), and pulmonary exacerbations (13%). In studies incorporating multivariable methods, FEV1 % predicted was positively associated with all CFQ-R 14+ domains with the exception of Digestion, Social Functioning, and Emotional Functioning. Male subjects reported higher Physical Functioning and lower Body Image scores than female subjects, BMI was positively correlated with Body Image and Weight, and age was negatively correlated with Treatment Burden. Pulmonary exacerbations were negatively associated with multiple domains, including Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, and Role Functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Although several factors have been found to be associated with the CFQ-R in adolescents and adults with CF, FEV1 % predicted and pulmonary exacerbations have the broadest impact on HRQoL. Further research is required to investigate the impact of age-related comorbidities, psychosocial factors, and treatment-related factors on HRQoL in adolescents/adults with cystic fibrosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.007
Bibliometrics0.0170.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations137
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207