Modulation of Gonadotropin II Release by K<sup>+</sup> Channel Blockers in Goldfish Gonadotropes: A Novel Stimulatory Action of 4‐Aminopyridine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of K+ channel blockers on basal gonadotropin II (GTH-II) release were examined in cultured goldfish gonadotropes. Tetraethylammonium (TEA) inhibited basal GTH-II release, whereas 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) increased basal release, although both K+ channel blockers generated increases in [Ca2+]i. Other K+ channel blockers had no significant effect on GTH-II release. We examined whether Ca2+ entry that arises from blockade of K+ channels by 4-AP mediates the secretory response. Secretion evoked by 4-AP was slightly reduced by TEA but was unaffected by reducing Ca2+ entry using either an inhibitor of Ca2+ channels, verapamil, or nominally Ca2+-free medium. In contrast, the Ca2+ signal evoked by 4-AP was largely blocked by Ca2+-free medium, as predicted by its inhibitory action on K+ channels. Together, these data suggest that the hormone release response to 4-AP is independent of entry of extracellular Ca2+. Finally, the mechanism of hormone release evoked by 4-AP appeared to be independent of mechanism(s) evoked by caffeine since 4-AP did not affect caffeine-evoked release and caffeine did not affect 4-AP evoked release. That both 4-AP and TEA generated Ca2+ signals but affected hormone release in either an extracellular Ca2+ independent (4-AP) or inhibitory (TEA) manner suggests that Ca2+ entry is linked to GTH-II secretion in a highly nonlinear fashion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".