MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162705435 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2003.812369

Further improve circuit partitioning using GBAW logic perturbation techniques

2003· article· en· W2162705435 on OpenAlexaff
Yu‐Liang Wu, D.I. Cheng, Hongbing Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypergraphGraph partitionComputer scienceElectronic circuitBenchmark (surveying)GraphLogic synthesisLogic gatePartition (number theory)Parallel computingLogic optimizationAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient circuit partitioning is becoming more and more important as the size of modern circuits keeps increasing. Conventionally, circuit partitioning is solved without altering the circuit by modeling the circuit as a hypergraph for the ease of applying graph algorithms. However, there is room for further improvement on even optimal hypergraph partitioning results, if logic information can be applied for circuit perturbation. Such logic transformation based partitioning techniques are relatively less addressed. In this paper, we present a powerful multiway partitioning technique which applies efficient logic rewiring techniques for further improvement over already superior hypergraph partitioning results. The approach can integrate with any graph partitioner. We perform experiments on two-, three-, and four-way partitionings for MCNC benchmark circuits whose physical and logical information are both available. Our experimental results show that this partitioning approach is very powerful. For example, it can achieve a further 12.3% reduction in cut size upon already excellent pure graph partitioner (hMetis) results on two-way partitioning with an area penalty of only 0.34%. The outperforming results demonstrate the usefulness of this new partitioning technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207