MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162707945 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.240242

Glutathionylation Acts as a Control Switch for Uncoupling Proteins UCP2 and UCP3

2011· article· en· W2162707945 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan J. Mailloux, Erin L. Seifert, Frédéric Bouillaud, Céline Aguer, Sheila Collins, Mary‐Ellen Harper

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsUCP3Uncoupling proteinOxidative phosphorylationCell biologyGlutathioneMitochondrial ROSOxidative stressReactive oxygen speciesRespirationPhosphorylationBiologyMitochondrionBiochemistryChemistryEnzymeAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mitochondrial uncoupling proteins 2 and 3 (UCP2 and -3) are known to curtail oxidative stress and participate in a wide array of cellular functions, including insulin secretion and the regulation of satiety. However, the molecular control mechanism(s) governing these proteins remains elusive. Here we reveal that UCP2 and UCP3 contain reactive cysteine residues that can be conjugated to glutathione. We further demonstrate that this modification controls UCP2 and UCP3 function. Both reactive oxygen species and glutathionylation were found to activate and deactivate UCP3-dependent increases in non-phosphorylating respiration. We identified both Cys(25) and Cys(259) as the major glutathionylation sites on UCP3. Additional experiments in thymocytes from wild-type and UCP2 null mice demonstrated that glutathionylation similarly diminishes non-phosphorylating respiration. Our results illustrate that UCP2- and UCP3-mediated state 4 respiration is controlled by reversible glutathionylation. Altogether, these findings advance our understanding of the roles UCP2 and UCP3 play in modulating metabolic efficiency, cell signaling, and oxidative stress processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations173
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207