Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)Viewpoint1 Dec 2006Food for Thought Primum Non Nocere: The Potential for Harm in Dysphagia Intervention Catriona M. Steele Catriona M. Steele Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Graduate Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of TorontoToronto, Ontario Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd15.4.19 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Bennett, J. W., & Steele, C. M. (2005, October). The impact of dysphagia on quality of life .Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia), 14, 24–27. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Bryant, M. (1991). Biofeedback in the treatment of a selected dysphagia patient..Dysphagia, 6, 140–144. Google Scholar Chaudhuri, G.,Hildner, C. D.,Brady, S.,Hutchins, B.,Aliga, N., & Abadilla, E. (2002). Cardiovascular effects of the supraglottic and super-supraglottic swallowing maneuvers in stroke patients with dysphagia..Dysphagia, 17, 19–23. Google Scholar Cichero, J. A.,Jackson, O.,Halley, P. J., & Murdoch, B. E. (2000a). How thick is thick? Multicenter study of the rheological and material property characteristics of mealtime fluids and videofluoroscopy fluids.Dysphagia, 15, 188–200. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Cichero, J. A.,Jackson, O.,Halley, P. J., & Murdoch, B. E. (2000b). Which one of these is not like the others? An inter-hospital study of the viscosity of thickened fluids..Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 43, 537–547. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Colodny, N. (2005). Dysphagic independent feeders’ justifications for noncompliance with recommendations by a speech-language pathologist..American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 61–70. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Crary, M. A. (1995). A direct intervention program for chronic neurogenic dysphagia secondary to brainstem stroke..Dysphagia, 10, 6–18. Google Scholar Crary, M. A., & Groher, M. E. (2000). Basic concepts of surface electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of dysphagia..American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 116–125. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Crary, M. A.,Carnaby-Mann, G. D.,Groher, M. E., & Helseth, E. (2004). Functional benefits of dysphagia therapy using adjunctive sEMG biofeedback.Dysphagia, 19, 160–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Easterling, C.,Grande, B.,Kern, M.,Sears, K., & Shaker, R. (2005). Attaining and maintaining isometric and isokinetic goals of the Shaker exercise..Dysphagia, 20, 133–138. Google Scholar Easterling, C.,Kern, M. K.,Nitschke, T.,Grande, B.,Kazandjian, M. S.,Dikeman, K. J.,et al.. (2000). Restoration of oral feeding in 17 tube-fed patients by the Shaker Exercise. [Abstract] .Dysphagia, 15, 105. Google Scholar Finestone, H.,Foley, N.,Woodbury, M.G., & Greene-Finestone, L. (2001). Quantifying fluid intake in dysphagic stroke patients: A preliminary comparison of oral and nonoral strategies..Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,, 82, 1744–1746. Google Scholar Finestone, H. M.,Greene-Finestone, L. S.,Wilson, E. S., & Teasell, R. W. (1995). Malnutrition in stroke patients on the rehabilitation service and at follow-up: Prevalence and predictors..Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 76, 310–316. Google Scholar Fraser, C.,Power, M.,Hamdy, S.,Rothwell, J.,Hobday, D.,Hollander, I.,et al.. (2002). Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury..Neuron, 34, 831–840. Google Scholar Fraser, C.,Rothwell, J.,Power, M.,Hobson, A.,Thompson, D., & Hamdy, S. (2003). Differential changes in human pharyngoesophageal motor excitability induced by swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation, and anaesthesia .American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal, Liver Physiology, 285,G 136–144. Google Scholar Freed, M. L.,Freed, L.,Chatburn, R. L., & Christian, M. (2001). Electrical Stimulation for swallowing disorders caused by stroke..Respiratory Care, 46, 466–474. Google Scholar Garcia, J. M.,Chambers, E. T.,Matta, Z., & Clark, M. (2005). Viscosity measurements of nectar- and honey-thick liquids: Product, liquid, and time comparisons .Dysphagia, 20, 325–335. Google Scholar Garcia, J. M.,Hakel, M., & Lazarus, C. (2004). Unexpected consequence of effortful swallowing: Case study report..Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 59–66. Google Scholar Glassburn, D. L., & Deem, J. F. (1998). Thickener viscosity in dysphagia management: Variability among speech-language pathologists..Dysphagia, 13, 218–222. Google Scholar Hamdy, S.,Rothwell, J. C.,Aziz, Q.,Singh, K. D., & Thompson, D. G. (1998). Long-term reorganization of human motor cortex driven by short-term sensory stimulation..Nature Neuroscience, 1, 64–68. Google Scholar Hind, J. A.,Nicosia, M. A.,Roecker, E.B., Carnes, M. L., & Robbins, J. (2001). Comparison of effortful and noneffortful swallows in healthy middle- aged and older adults..Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82, 1661–1665. Google Scholar Huckabee, M. L., & Cannito, M. (1999). Outcomes of swallowing rehabilitation in chronic brainstem dysphagia: A retrospective evaluation .Dysphagia, 14, 93–109. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Lazarus, C.,Logemann, J. A.,Huang, C.F., & Rademaker, A. W. (2003). Effects of two types of tongue strengthening exercises in young normals .Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 55, 199–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Ludlow, C. L.,Humbert, I.,Saxon, K.,Poletto, C.,Sonies, B., & Crujido, L. (2006). Effects of surface electrical stimulation both at rest and during swallowing in chronic pharyngeal dysphagia [Electronic version]..Dysphagia, 1–10. Google Scholar Power, M.,Fraser, C.,Hobson, A.,Rothwell, J. C.,Mistry, S.,Nicholson, D. A.,et al. (2004). Changes in pharyngeal cortico-bulbar excitability and swallowing behavior after oral stimulation..American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology, 286, G45–50. Google Scholar Rasley, A.,Logemann, J. A.,Kahrilas, P. J.,Rademaker, A. W.,Pauloski, B.R., & Dodds, W. J. (1993). Prevention of barium aspiration during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies: Value of change in posture..American Journal of Roentgenology, 160, 1005–1009. Google Scholar Robbins, J. (1999). Old swallowing and dysphagia: Thoughts on intervention and prevention..Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 14, S21–S26. Google Scholar Robbins, J.,Gangnon, R. E.,Theis, S. M.,Kays, S. A.,Hewitt, A. L., & Hind, J. A. (2005). The effects of lingual exercise on swallowing in older adults..Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 53, 1483–1489. Google Scholar Robbins, J.,Nicosia, M. A.,Hind, J. A.,Gill, G. D.,Blanco, R., & Logemann, J. A. (2002, June). Defining physical properties of fluids for dysphagia evaluation and treatment..Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia), 11, 16–19. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Shaker, R.,Easterling, C.,Kern, M.,Nitschke, T.,Massey, B.,Daniels, S. , et al. (2002). Rehabilitation of swallowing by exercise in tube-fed patients with pharyngeal dysphagia secondary to abnormal UES opening..Gastroenterology, 122, 1314–1321. Google Scholar Shaker, R.,Kern, M.,Bardan, E.,Taylor, A.,Stewart, E. T.,Hoffmann, R. G.,et al. (1997). Augmentation of deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter opening in the elderly by exercise .American Journal of Physiology, 272, G1518–G1522. Google Scholar Shanahan, T. K.,Logemann, J. A.,Rademaker, A. W.,Pauloski, B. R., & Kahrilas, P. J. (1993). Chin-down posture effect on aspiration in dysphagic patients..Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 736–739. Google Scholar Sharkawi, A. E.,Ramig, L.,Logemann, J. A.,Pauloski, B. R.,Rademaker, A. W.,Smith, C. H.,et al. (2002). Swallowing and voice effects of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT): A pilot study .Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 72, 31–36. Google Scholar Steele, C. M. (2004). Electrical stimulation of the pharyngeal swallow: Does the evidence support application in clinical practice?.Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 28, 77–83. Google Scholar Steele, C. M. (2005). Searching for meaningful differences in viscosity .Dysphagia, 20, 336–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Steele, C. M.,Thrasher, A. T., & Popovic, M. R. (in press.). Electrical stimulation approaches to the restoration and rehabilitation of swallowing: A review..Neurological Research. Google Scholar Suiter, D. M.,Leder, S. B., & Ruark, J. L. (2006). Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on submental muscle activity..Dysphagia, 21, 56–60. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byPerspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups6:4 (897-911)20 Aug 2021A Preliminary Study of Nursing Practice Patterns Concerning Dysphagia Diet Modification: Implications for Interprofessional Education With SLPsNaomi Gurevich, Danielle R. Osmelak and Sydney OsentoskiPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)22:3 (107-117)1 Nov 2013Managing Dysphagia in Long-Term Care Settings: Clinical ConsiderationsLuis F. Riquelme Volume 15 Issue 4 December 2006 Pages: 19-23 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Dec 1, 2006 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2006 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.475 | 0.156 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".