MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162717580 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65642-x

MYCOBACTERIAL CELL WALL EXTRACT FOR TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BLADDER

2001· article· en· W2162717580 on OpenAlexaff
Álvaro Morales, Joseph L. Chin, Ernest W. Ramsey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarcinoma in situIn situCarcinomaPathologyCancer researchOncologyUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) established immunotherapy as an effective modality for carcinoma in situ of the bladder and remains the most effective agent for treatment. However, as a live organism it has the potential for undesirable side effects and toxicity. This result has led to the search for other active and safer biological response modifiers. We investigated the efficacy of a mycobacterial cell wall extract (MCWE) from Mycobacterium phlei, which does not contain live bacteria, for management of carcinoma in situ of the bladder in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The requirement for an emulsified preparation was investigated with photon correlation spectroscopy to determine the stability of the bacterial fragments. A total of 61 patients with histologically documented carcinoma in situ completed the study. Cell wall extract from M. phlei suspended in oil droplets to form an emulsion were instilled into the bladder at a dose of 4 mg. once weekly for 6 weeks and then monthly for 1 year. Response assessment was performed at 3-month intervals. Complete response to treatment indicated the absence of endoscopic and histological evidence of carcinoma in situ. Partial responders were those cases in which cystoscopy and biopsies were negative but cytology was suspicious for malignant cells. All other cases were considered failures. RESULTS: The need for an emulsified suspension of the cell wall extract was confirmed by the demonstration that the cell wall extract alone in urine aggregated, whereas the MCWE emulsion had remained stable. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed negative cystoscopy and biopsies in 62.5% at 12, 49.3% at 24 and 41.1% of patients at 60 weeks after therapy. After this point the number of responders had remained stable. Excellent tolerance with minimal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates clinical activity of low doses of MCWE against human bladder cancer. The results observed at the dosage used in our trial are less than those observed with live BCG. However, MCWE has a better toxicity profile and can be instilled in the presence of a disrupted urothelium. It also appears to exhibit activity in patients in whom BCG has failed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207