MYCOBACTERIAL CELL WALL EXTRACT FOR TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BLADDER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) established immunotherapy as an effective modality for carcinoma in situ of the bladder and remains the most effective agent for treatment. However, as a live organism it has the potential for undesirable side effects and toxicity. This result has led to the search for other active and safer biological response modifiers. We investigated the efficacy of a mycobacterial cell wall extract (MCWE) from Mycobacterium phlei, which does not contain live bacteria, for management of carcinoma in situ of the bladder in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The requirement for an emulsified preparation was investigated with photon correlation spectroscopy to determine the stability of the bacterial fragments. A total of 61 patients with histologically documented carcinoma in situ completed the study. Cell wall extract from M. phlei suspended in oil droplets to form an emulsion were instilled into the bladder at a dose of 4 mg. once weekly for 6 weeks and then monthly for 1 year. Response assessment was performed at 3-month intervals. Complete response to treatment indicated the absence of endoscopic and histological evidence of carcinoma in situ. Partial responders were those cases in which cystoscopy and biopsies were negative but cytology was suspicious for malignant cells. All other cases were considered failures. RESULTS: The need for an emulsified suspension of the cell wall extract was confirmed by the demonstration that the cell wall extract alone in urine aggregated, whereas the MCWE emulsion had remained stable. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed negative cystoscopy and biopsies in 62.5% at 12, 49.3% at 24 and 41.1% of patients at 60 weeks after therapy. After this point the number of responders had remained stable. Excellent tolerance with minimal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates clinical activity of low doses of MCWE against human bladder cancer. The results observed at the dosage used in our trial are less than those observed with live BCG. However, MCWE has a better toxicity profile and can be instilled in the presence of a disrupted urothelium. It also appears to exhibit activity in patients in whom BCG has failed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".