MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162738335 · doi:10.1002/hyp.10590

Groundwater and surface water influences on streamflow in a mesoscale Precambrian Shield catchment

2015· article· en· W2162738335 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nathan Mountain, April L. James, Krystopher J. Chutko

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
FundersMinistry of EnvironmentCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsGroundwaterStreamflowGroundwater rechargeHydrology (agriculture)SnowmeltSurface waterGeologyGroundwater flowEnvironmental scienceWatershedAquiferDrainage basinGeomorphologySnowGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrologic research has increasingly recognized the importance of mesoscale studies to provide a fundamental understanding of how processes combine at scales relevant to water resource management. At the mesoscale, the influence of landscape heterogeneity including both natural and human‐altered conditions on streamflow generation is an open question, one to which analysis of stable water isotopes (SWI) is increasingly being applied. In this study, SWI surveys are used to better understand spatial and temporal patterns of source‐water contributions to streamflow in the Wistiwasing watershed (235 km 2 ) located near Callander Bay, Ontario, Canada, a Precambrian Shield headwater with mixed landuse (e.g. agriculture, forest). Biweekly surveys of surface water, groundwater and precipitation were conducted during May to September 2012, and samples were analysed for SWI (δ 18 O and δ 2 H) using a Picarro L2120‐ i . Maps of point‐scale surface water SWI were generated for each of the nine surveys, and an SWI isoscape, an interpolated contour map, was generated from groundwater observations. Based on a comparison of surface and groundwater SWI maps, regions of strong groundwater influence on streamflow were particularly identifiable during low‐flow, late‐summer conditions and corresponded with coarse‐textured glaciolacustrine deposits. Higher‐flow, early‐period conditions featured small SWI variation with values resembling long‐term groundwater recharge, a mix of snowmelt and spring/fall rains. Late‐period, low‐flow conditions indicated large spatial variability due to changing influences of groundwater and upstream surface water undergoing summertime evaporative enrichment of heavier isotopes. In this case study, SWI observations provide important insight into source‐water dynamics across a mesoscale watershed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological ProcessesSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207