Hormonal mechanisms regulating hepatic vitellogenin synthesis in the gilthead sea bream, <i>Sparus aurata</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiments were carried out to study in vitro the effects of 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), homologous pituitary homogenate (HPH), and recombinant red sea bream growth hormone (sbGH) on vitellogenin (VTG) secretion from cultured sea bream liver fragments. Basal secretion of VTG was found to be significantly higher in the prespawning period, compared with sea bream liver in the spawning and postspawning periods. Similarly, the sea bream liver obtained during the prespawning period responded more significantly to treatments with E(2), HPH, or sbGH compared with sea bream liver during spawning. In the postspawning period, treatments with E(2), HPH, or sbGH were without significant effect on VTG secretion level in sea bream liver. The level of E(2) receptors was also analyzed by Western blot analysis. The result demonstrates a significantly higher level of E(2) receptors in the sea bream liver at the prespawning stage compared with those at the spawning and postspawning stages. The findings support the hypothesis that homologous upregulation of estrogen receptors plays an important role in the estrogen-sensitive control of VTG synthesis in the sea bream liver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".