MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162914317 · doi:10.1136/jmg.40.4.e51

Absence of constitutional <i>H2AX</i> gene mutations in 101 hereditary breast cancer families

2003· article· en· W2162914317 on OpenAlexaff
Álvaro N.A. Monteiro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Genetics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCoalition for Research in Women's Health
FundersNational Cancer InstituteBreast Cancer Research Foundation
KeywordsCHEK2Breast cancerGermline mutationDNA repairCancer researchAtaxia-telangiectasiaCheckpoint Kinase 2GeneticsLi–Fraumeni syndromeDNA damageNonsense mutationGermlineBiologyMutationCancer syndromeCancerBRCA2 ProteinHomologous recombinationGeneDNAMissense mutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

everal genes involved in the DNA damage response and in maintaining genomic stability have emerged as breast cancer susceptibility genes.These include BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as other genes with smaller contributions to breast cancer aetiology, such as TP53, CHEK2, and ATM.Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 increase sensitivity to DNA damage and decrease cellular capacity to repair double strand DNA breaks through homologous recombination.1-3 Interestingly, DNA damage induces activation of ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated), which performs a central role in relaying signals that orchestrate DNA repair.4 People with heterozygous nonsense mutations in ATM appear to display increased susceptibility to breast cancer.5-7 Besides rapidly phosphorylating BRCA1, 8 activated ATM also phosphorylates p53 and CHEK2 (CHK2, hCDS1), which have been implicated in breast cancer predisposition.Germline mutations in TP53 or CHEK2 cause Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a multiple cancer phenotype syndrome, which features early onset breast cancer.9 10 Recently, it was found that germline mutations in CHEK2 also increase the relative risk for breast cancer outside the Li-Fraumeni syndrome.11 12 Given the emerging relationship of impaired DNA damage response and breast cancer susceptibility, we hypothesised that other genes in this pathway might be candidate cancer susceptibility genes.Histone H2AX (H2AFX, OMIM 601772) is such a candidate gene.H2AX is a minor variant of the highly conserved histone H2A that is part of the histone octamer in the core of the nucleosome.13 It differs from H2A by having a longer carboxyterminal tail that contains an SQE motif, a consensus site for phosphorylation by PI3K related kinases such as ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK.Following DNA damage, ATM phosphorylates H2AX at serine 139 (part of the SQE motif) 14 and phosphorylated H2AX (γ-H2AX) seems to localise specifically at sites of damage.15 16 More importantly, several proteins involved in DNA repair including BRCA1, BRCA2, Rad51, and Mre11 are recruited to sites of γ-H2AX.16 Two other independent lines of evidence derived from model organisms support the notion that H2AX plays an important role in the DNA damage response and in chromosomal stability.Phosphorylation of S129 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae H2A (homologous to S139 in human H2AX) is necessary for efficient processing of DNA repair and is proposed to cause alteration of chromatin structure that facilitates repair.17 Mice lacking H2AX are sensitive to radiation, are growth retarded, and their cells display high levels of ionising radiation induced chromosomal instability.18 19 Thus, although the exact function of H2AX is still unknown, it is clear that it plays a role in the DNA damage response.To establish if germline H2AX mutations are present in breast cancer families, DNA samples were obtained from 101 unrelated breast cancer patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical GeneticsSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207