Structural Elements of Instantaneous and Slow Gating in Hyperpolarization-activated Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Channels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) subunits produce a slowly activating current in response to hyperpolarization (If) and an instantaneous voltage-independent current (Iinst) when expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Here we found that a mutation in the S4-S5 linker of HCN2 (Y331D) produced an additional mixed cationic instantaneous current. However, this current was inhibited by external Cs+ like If and unlike Iinst. Together with a concomitant reduction in If, the data suggest that the Y331D mutation disrupted channel closing placing the channel in a "If-like," and not an "Iinst-like," state. The "If-like" instantaneous current represented approximately 70% of total If over voltages ranging from +20 to -150 mV in high K+ solutions. If activated at more depolarized potentials and the activation curve was less steep, whereas deactivation was significantly slowed, consistent with the idea that the mutation inhibited channel closing. The data suggest that the mutation produced allosteric effects on the activation gate (S6 segment) and/or on voltage-sensing elements. We also found that decreases in the ratio of external K+/Na+ further disrupted channel closing in the mutant channel. Finally, our data suggest that the structures involved in producing Iinst are similar between the HCN1 and HCN2 isoforms and that excess HCN protein on the plasma membrane of CHO cells relative to native cells is not responsible for Iinst. The data are consistent with Iinst flowing through a "leaky" closed state but do not rule out flow through a second configuration of recombinant HCN channels or up-regulated endogenous channels/subunits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".