Suitability of recommended limits for fasting glucose tests in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Canadian and American Diabetes Associations recommend the use of an oral glucose tolerance test to screen for abnormal glucose tolerance among women with polycystic ovary syndrome when their fasting plasma glucose level is 5.7 mmol/L or more (Canadian guideline) and 5.6 mmol/L or more (American). Our objective was to determine the predictive value of 5.6 mmol/L as a fasting plasma glucose cutoff for detecting abnormal glucose tolerance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and then to define the optimal cutoff for this population. METHODS: An oral glucose tolerance test was administered to 105 consecutive women with polycystic ovary syndrome referred to an academic reproductive endocrine clinic. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: The sensitivity of a 5.6 mmol/L cutoff was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30%-67%); its specificity, 98.7% (95% CI 96.1%-100%). With this cutoff, 52% of women with polycystic ovary syndrome whose glucose tolerance is abnormal would be missed. The prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance was 28%, with a positive predictive value of 93% (95% CI 81%-100%) and a negative predictive value of 83% (95% CI 76%-91%). The likelihood ratio for a positive test was 36.7 (95% CI 5.0-267), and for a negative test, 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.7). The optimal fasting plasma glucose cutoff value was 5.0 mmol/L, with a 79% sensitivity (95% CI 65%-94%) and 66% specificity (95% CI 55%-77%). If this cutoff were used, 24% of women with abnormal glucose tolerance would still be missed. INTERPRETATION: The Canadian and American recommendations--of screening for abnormal glucose tolerance with an oral glucose tolerance test only when the results of a fasting plasma glucose test are 5.7 mmol/L (or 5.6 mmol/L) or more--are inappropriate for women with polycystic ovary syndrome. We therefore recommend that all women with polycystic ovary syndrome have an oral glucose tolerance test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".