Practice Variation among Pediatric Emergency Departments in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Bronchiolitis is the most common disease of the lower respiratory tract in the first year of life. Treatment is controversial, with studies giving conflicting views on the benefits of bronchodilators and steroids. The objectives of this study were 1) to characterize the management of bronchiolitis in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) in Canada, 2) to determine patient outcomes following emergency department (ED) visits, and 3) to provide descriptive data regarding bronchiolitis symptoms and family/personal medical history of these patients. METHODS: A prospective consecutive cohort of children with bronchiolitis presenting to seven Canadian PEDs was enrolled during a seven-to-21-day period. Standardized interviews with parents provided data regarding symptoms, previous treatment, and past history. Charts were reviewed for treatment, investigations, and disposition. Telephone follow-up at two to three weeks collected information regarding duration of illness and return visits. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-seven (91%) of 260 eligible patients were enrolled. One hundred eighty-nine patients (80%) had both an interview and chart review, and 48 (20%) had only chart reviews; follow-up was completed for 163 (69%) patients. One hundred fifteen (63%) had seen their primary care provider during their illness prior to the ED visit. Seventy-three percent of patients (range per site 59-100%) were treated in the ED with bronchodilators (usually salbutamol or epinephrine) and 5% (range per site 0-14%) with oral steroids. Twenty-four percent (58/237) were prescribed bronchodilators on discharge, 3% (7/237) inhaled steroids, and 2% (5/237) oral steroids. Chi-square tests indicated significant practice variation by site in ED bronchodilator use (p < 0.001) and bronchodilator use at discharge (p = 0.0003). Admission rate was 31% (range by site 22-43%), 17% of patients had more than one ED visit, and 1% were admitted more than once. Admission rates were increased in younger children, children with comorbidities, and children with lower oxygen saturation. Viral studies were obtained in 53%, with 76% of these positive for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Median duration of cough was 12 days, poor sleeping and irritability eight days, and wheeze and poor feeding seven days. CONCLUSIONS: This study prospectively describes the treatment of bronchiolitis in the pediatric ED. The findings are consistent with the literature regarding the reported use of bronchodilators; however, use of steroids was found to be much lower than reported in other studies. Bronchodilator use in the ED and at discharge varied significantly by site. The results capture variation in treatment practices in Canadian PEDs, which may be the result of discordant randomized controlled trial evidence. Further research is needed to establish best practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".