MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2162940650 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.1178

Endoscopic ablation of Hunner’s lesions in interstitial cystitis patients

2013· article· en· W2162940650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ryan A. Payne, R Corey O'Connor, Margarita Kressin, Michael L. Guralnick

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAblationCystoscopeInterstitial cystitisLesionCystoscopySurgeryRadiologyUrinary systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: We report our experience with endoscopic ablationof Hunner’s lesions in women with interstitial cystitis (IC).Methods: A chart review was performed on 14 patients with ICsymptoms who were identified to have bladder lesions and underwentendoscopic ablation. A Hunner’s lesion was identified asan area of erythema that reproduced the patients’ pain when touchedby the cystoscope. Pathology reports were reviewed and improvementin pain was used as the main outcome measure.Results: Of the 14 patients, 12 had more than 50% symptomaticimprovement and 8 patients reported 100% improvement. Meanimprovement was 76%. In all patients who improved, the biopsyspecimen showed inflammatory cystitis, often with epithelialdenudation. Four patients had symptomatic recurrence, but allhad improvement after repeat ablation.Conclusion: Endoscopic ablation of Hunner’s lesions improves symptomsin IC patients. Recurrence of symptoms should prompt repeatcystoscopy to identify recurrent lesions, as repeat ablation offerssymptomatic improvement.Introduction : L’article fait état de notre expérience concernantl’ablation endoscopique d’ulcères de Hunner chez des femmesatteintes de cystite interstitielle (CI).Méthodologie : On a mené un examen des dossiers de 14 patientesprésentant des symptômes de CI chez qui des lésions vésicalesavaient été observées et traitées par ablation endoscopique. Unulcère de Hunner était défini comme une zone d’érythème reproduisantla douleur décrite par la patiente lorsque cette zone étaittouchée à l’aide du cystoscope. Les rapports de pathologie ontété examinés et la réduction de la douleur a été utilisée commeprincipal critère d’évaluation.Résultats : Sur les 14 patientes, 12 ont présenté une réduction supérieureà 50 % des symptômes et 8 ont signalé une réduction de 100 %. Letaux moyen de réduction était de 76 %. Chez toutes les patientesayant signalé une réduction des symptômes, l’échantillon de tissuprélevé par biopsie montrait la présence de cystite inflammatoire,souvent accompagnée de dénudation épithéliale. Quatre patientesont signalé une réapparition des symptômes, mais une nouvelle ablationa permis de réduire encore une fois les symptômes.Conclusion : L’ablation endoscopique des ulcères de Hunner entraîneune réduction des symptômes en présence de CI. La réapparitiondes symptômes devrait être prise en charge par une nouvelle cystoscopieafin de repérer les nouvelles lésions; une nouvelle ablationpermet de soulager les symptômes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207