SELECTION OF VIABLE CARDIOMYOCYTES FOR CELL TRANSPLANTATION USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL TISSUE CULTURE1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We developed a three-dimensional cardiac tissue culture system to select viable and contractile cells for the purpose of cardiomyocyte transplantation. In this study we will show that reaggregation of cardiomyocytes in culture is an active process indicative of cardiomyocyte viability and functionality. METHODS: Myocardial tissue from newborn mice has been enzymatically digested, incubated in culture inserts, and studied by phase contrast microscopy, conventional histology, immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and TUNEL assay. RESULTS: Cells that are plated on nonadhesive surfaces, reaggregate to spontaneously contracting cell aggregates. The capacity to reaggregate was significantly dependent from the age of the tissue donor (P<0.0001) and on the method of enzymatic dissociation (P<0.0001). The majority of cells within the aggregates consisted of cardiomyocytes. After 24 hr incubation, significant amounts of laminin and fibronectin had been deposited between the cells. Ultrastructural analysis revealed viable cardiomyocytes attached to each other by tight junctions. The apoptotic rate within the aggregates was 11.4+/-4.6 vs. 44.5+/-10.5% immediately after dissociation (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The capacity to form spontaneously contracting aggregates is an inherent characteristic of viable cardiomyocytes in 3-dimensional cultures, which could be successfully exploited for cellular cardiomyocyte transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".