Measuring Commuters’ Perception on Service Quality Using SERVQUAL in Public Transportation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the current scenario of globalization, public transportation services (PTS) need to introspect sensitivitytowards the quality of services offered. In this context, this study examined the commuters’ perception onservice quality offered by the public transport services of twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad, India. TheSERVQUAL scale is administered to measure the commuter’s perception on service quality. A survey wasconducted among the commuters who were regularly availing public transport services for travelling. A randomsample of 534 respondents were taken for data collection, among them 512 were finalized for final analysis. Thestudy concluded that the service quality delivery meets the perception of commuters. In general, people of twincities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad are benefited with the service quality delivery by public transport services.This paper brings out a service quality image which can be adopted by other cities whose population depends onpublic transportation services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it