Exposure to carbon monoxide during indoor karting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Karting is a recreational activity of increasing popularity and it is often practiced indoors leading to build up of toxic gases in ambient air. This study was realised to verify the level of exposure to carbon monoxide (CO) in ten male racers (Age: 15 to 49 years old) during a 45-min race. The alveolar concentration of CO (alvCO) for each participant was measured before and after the race. The ambient CO level was determined continuously from the start to the end of the race with two detectors. Mean ambient air CO concentration was 41 ppm and the average increase of alvCO for the ten subjects was 16.2 ppm corresponding to about 3% COHb. Based on these results and on the Coburn model, a reference limit of 25 ppm was suggested for a 1 h exposure during indoor karting. At the request of the public health authorities, some modifications were made to the karts, to the CO monitoring surveillance system and to the ventilation system of the building. CO concentrations were monitored thereafter. The guideline of 25 ppm for 60 min was always respected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".