Nutrient-Related Issues Affecting Successful Experimental Orthotopic Small Bowel Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study tested the effectiveness of a nutrient-rich preservation solution in a small animal model of orthotopic whole small bowel transplantation. METHODS: Lewis rats received syngeneic total orthotopic small bowel graft after cold storage for 6 h. Donor small bowel was flushed vascularly with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution and flushed luminally with UW solution or an amino acid-rich (AA) solution as follows: Group 1, no luminal flush; Group 2, UW solution; Group 3, AA solution. Biopsies were taken over 14 days posttransplant; energetics, oxidative stress, neutrophil recruitment and histologic injury were assessed. RESULTS: All animals in Groups 1 and 2 failed to survive 12 h posttransplant due to hemorrhagic shock and fluid loss. In contrast, all animals in Group 3 survived the operation; survival after 14 days was 80% (4/5). In Group 3, full recovery of tissue adenylates (ATP and energy charge) to freshly isolated tissue values occurred within 3 days. Oxidative stress as assessed by malondialdehyde (MDA) levels was low in Group 3 throughout 14 d; Groups 1 and 2 exhibited high oxidative stress over the initial 35 min reperfusion (P<0.05). Neutrophil recruitment (myeloperoxidase activity) was significantly reduced in Group 3 tissues, as was histologic injury (P<0.05 compared to Groups 1 and 2). By day 14, Group 3 exhibited complete mucosal restoration. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented in this communication supports the use of an intraluminal preservation solution that is tailored to the metabolic requirements of the small bowel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".