Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyOpposing Views1 Nov 2013Is Sperm DNA Integrity Assessment Useful? Ashok Agarwal, Armand Zini, and Mark Sigman Ashok AgarwalAshok Agarwal More articles by this author , Armand ZiniArmand Zini More articles by this author , and Mark SigmanMark Sigman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.004AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Long-term effects of mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection with DNA-fragmented sperm on health and behavior of adult offspring. Biol Reprod2008; 78: 761. Google Scholar 2 : Are sperm chromatin and DNA defects relevant in the clinic?. Syst Biol Reprod Med2011; 57: 78. Google Scholar 3 : Frequency and severity of sperm DNA damage in patients with confirmed cases of male infertility of different aetiologies. Reprod Biomed Online2010; 20: 759. Google Scholar 4 : Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study. Int J Androl2010; 33: e221. Google Scholar 5 : The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod2012; 27: 2908. Google Scholar 6 : Oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in sperm has a negative impact on clinical pregnancy rate in intrauterine insemination but not intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril2011; 96: 843. Google Scholar 7 : The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing: a guideline. Fertil Steril2013; 99: 673. Google Scholar 8 American Urological Association: The optimal evaluation of the infertile male: best practice statement revised (2010). Available at http://www.auanet.org/education/guidelines/male-infertility-d.cfm. Accessed July 5, 2013. Google Scholar © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByNiederberger C (2018) Re: Concordance among Sperm Deoxyribonucleic Acid Integrity Assays and Semen ParametersJournal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 2, (447-447), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016.Niederberger C (2018) Re: Sperm Deoxyribonucleic Acid Fragmentation Assessment in Normozoospermic Male Partners of Couples with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Prospective StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 4, (1232-1232), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016. Volume 190Issue 5November 2013Page: 1645-1647 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ashok Agarwal More articles by this author Armand Zini More articles by this author Mark Sigman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".