MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163274926 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2014-0133

A new crocodylian (Eusuchia) from the uppermost Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada

2015· article· en· W2163274926 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Xiaochun Wu, Donald B. Brinkman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Tyrrell MuseumCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousPaleontologyPremaxillaMandibular symphysisGeologyRange (aeronautics)GenusSister groupGeographyPhylogenetic treeBiologyZoologyCladeSymphysisAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Albertosuchus knudsenii gen. et sp. nov. is described on the basis of an incomplete skeleton from the lower part (uppermost Cretaceous) of the Scollard Formation, southern Alberta, Canada. It is probably a crocodyloid, the only Canadian representative of the group and also the sole crocodylian known during the latest Cretaceous in Canada. Within the Crocodyloidea, A. knudsenii is one of the most basal forms and shares a sister-group relationship with the European genus Arenysuchus. However, it needs to be emphasized that because of its incompleteness, phylogenetic relationships proposed here for A. knudsenii may change when better-preserved specimens are found. Albertosuchus knudsenii differs from other crocodyloids in having no premaxilla-maxillary notch, a very short mandibular symphysis with the involvement of the splenial, and an extremely deep hypapophysis on the last cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae. The discovery of A. knudsenii may expand the geographical range of the Crocodyloidea into Canada during the Cretaceous. Crocodylians in the lower part of the Scollard Formation are of low diversity compared with that of the corresponding Hell Creek Formation of Montana and Lance Formation of Wyoming, both farther to the south in the USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207