Interactions between peptidoglycan and the ExeAB complex during assembly of the type II secretin of <i>Aeromonas hydrophila</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aeromonas hydrophila transports extracellular protein toxins via the type II secretion system, an export mechanism comprised of numerous proteins that spans both the inner and outer membranes. Two components of this secretion system, ExeA and ExeB, form a complex in the inner membrane that functions to locate and/or assemble the ExeD secretin in the outer membrane. In the studies reported here, two-codon insertion mutagenesis of exeA revealed that an insertion at amino acid 495 in the C-terminal region of ExeA did not alter ExeAB complex formation yet completely abrogated its involvement in ExeD secretin assembly and thus rendered the bacteria secretion negative. In silico analysis of protein motifs with similar amino acid profiles revealed that this amino acid is located within a putative peptidoglycan (PG) binding motif in the periplasmic domain of ExeA. Substitution mutations of three highly conserved amino acids in the motif were constructed. In cells expressing each of these mutants, the ability to assemble the ExeD secretin or secrete aerolysin was lost, while ExeA retained the ability to form a complex with ExeB. In in vivo cross-linking experiments, wild-type ExeA could be cross-linked to PG, whereas the three substitution mutants of ExeA could not. These data indicate that PG binding and/or remodelling plays a role in the function of the ExeAB complex during assembly of the ExeD secretin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".