The Occurrence of Anular Tears and Their Relation to Lifetime Back Pain History: A Cadaveric Study Using Barium Sulfate Discography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. The occurrence of anular tears and general disc degeneration of the lumbar spine was studied in relation to the lifetime frequency of back pain. Summary of Background Data. Although anular tears and ruptures are common targets for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, the relationship between disc findings and back pain has been weak or nonexistent. Methods. The data comprised barium sulfate discograms of lumbar spine levels from 157 male cadavers. The extent of “anular tears” and “general disc degeneration” based on posterior-anterior and side views were evaluated separately using a 4-point scale. Lifetime history of back pain occurrence and work were obtained from the families of 86 cadavers. To assess whether the risk of back pain changed with the severity of findings or the level of disc, we applied trend tests and proportional-odds logistic models for occurrence data. Results. In early adulthood, the risk of anular tears was 0.6 to 0.7, whereas at retirement age, tears were practically unavoidable. The risk of full anular tears with barium sulfate leaking (“leaking” tear) was estimated to be 0.10 and 0.35 among the men in the age groups of 20 to 49 and 50 to 59 years, respectively. The risk of “leaking” tears was greatest at the L5–S1 levels. There were less severe degenerative findings associated with sedentary occupation but no differences between driving and physically light and heavy occupations. Overall, the risk of any anular tears and any general degeneration as defined was similar. The frequency of back pain had a highly significant relation to the occurrence of tears (model-based P = 0.0009). With a “leaking” tear, the model-based estimate of the risk of frequent lifetime back pain was 0.42, with an “outer” tear the risk was 0.20, and with no tears or “inner” tears the risk was 0.10 (the observed prevalence was 0). The effect of occupational loading was of borderline significance (P = 0.045). Conclusion. Anular degeneration of the lumbar discs appear earlier and are more clearly related to back pain than previously thought, most probably due to the better sensitivity of the BaSO4 discography method to detect tears. The occurrence of anular tears general and disc degeneration was studied in relation to the lifetime frequency of back pain using BaSO4 discograms of lumbar spine from cadavers. Lifetime history of back pain occurrence and work were obtained from the families. Anular degeneration of the lumbar discs appears earlier and is more clearly related to back pain than previously thought. Heavy physical loading seems to exacerbate back pain but has only a minor effect on disc degeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it