Functional Analysis of an Arabidopsis T-DNA "Knockout" of the High-Affinity NH4+ Transporter AtAMT1;1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NH(4)(+) acquisition by plant roots is thought to involve members of the NH(4)(+) transporter family (AMT) found in plants, yeast, bacteria, and mammals. In Arabidopsis, there are six AMT genes of which AtAMT1;1 demonstrates the highest affinity for NH(4)(+). Ammonium influx into roots and AtAMT1;1 mRNA expression levels are highly correlated diurnally and when plant nitrogen (N) status is varied. To further investigate the involvement of AtAMT1;1 in high-affinity NH(4)(+) influx, we identified a homozygous T-DNA mutant with disrupted AtAMT1;1 activity. Contrary to expectation, high-affinity (13)NH(4)(+) influx in the amt1;1:T-DNA mutant was similar to the wild type when grown with adequate N. Removal of N to increase AtAMT1;1 expression decreased high-affinity (13)NH(4)(+) influx in the mutant by 30% compared with wild-type plants, whereas low-affinity (13)NH(4)(+) influx (250 microM-10 mM NH(4)(+)) exceeded that of wild-type plants. In these N-deprived plants, mRNA copy numbers of root AtAMT1;3 and AtAMT2;1 mRNA were significantly more increased in the mutant than in wild-type plants. Under most growth conditions, amt1;1:T-DNA plants were indistinguishable from the wild type, however, leaf morphology was altered. However, when grown with NH(4)(+) and sucrose, the mutant grew poorly and died. Our results are the first in planta evidence that AtAMT1;1 is a root NH(4)(+) transporter and that redundancies within the AMT family may allow compensation for the loss of AtAMT1;1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".