Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients on a corticosteroid-free regimen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetics of both tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients on a corticosteroid-free regimen was evaluated. METHODS: Upon administration of steady-state morning tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil doses, 28 patients for whom at least three months had passed after renal transplantation underwent serial blood sample collection over a 12-hour dosing period. Whole blood concentrations of tacrolimus were measured, as were mycophenolic acid, mycophenolic acid 7-0-glucuronide (MPAG), and acyl glucuronide MPAG (AcMPAG) concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were then analyzed by conventional noncompartmental modeling. RESULTS: The mean ± S.D. pharmacokinetic parameters for tacrolimus, normalized to a dose of 1 mg, were as follows: area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 52.6 ± 24.8 μg · hr/L/mg; maximum concentration (C(max)), 8.0 ± 3.3 μg/L/mg; time to C(max) (t(max)), 1.8 ± 1.0 hr; and minimum concentration (C(min)), 2.6 ± 1.4 μg/L/mg. The mean ± S.D. pharmacokinetic parameters for mycophenolic acid, normalized to a mycophenolate mofetil dose of 1 g, were AUC, 26.9 ± 13.2 μg ·hr/mL/g; C(max), 17.5 ± 5.4 μg/mL/g; t(max), 0.9 ± 0.6 hr; and C(min), 1.5 ± 1.1 μg/mL/g. The free fraction of mycophenolic acid was 1.8% ± 0.7%. AUC ratios of MPAG:mycophenolic acid and AcMPAG:mycophenolic acid were 13.0 ± 5.8 and 0.1 ± 0.2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall exposure and C(min) values for tacrolimus were similar but C(max) values were higher than those documented in renal transplant patients treated with corticosteroid-based regimens. This may have clinical implications in corticosteroid-free patients experiencing symptoms of tacrolimus toxicity despite trough levels within target ranges. Mycophenolic acid exposure increased with time, but AUC values fell within the range expected for patients receiving concurrent corticosteroids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".