An investigation into the native‐like properties of de novo designed cavitand‐based four‐helix bundle proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We investigated the hydrophobic packing of two previously designed caviteins, LG2 and LG3, which differ by one Gly in the linker regions between the peptide sequence and the cavitand scaffold. We sought to diminish the putative native‐like properties of LG2 and LG3, and see if we could diagnose a change in the conformational specificity of the hydrophobic core. We replaced the leucine residues with norleucine residues at the hydrophobic positions in LG2 and LG3, to create NG2 and NG3, respectively. LG2 exhibited more dispersion, but less sharp signals than LG3 in the amide region of its 1 H NMR spectrum. NG3 and NG2 were found to be slightly less helical and significantly less stable toward guanidine hydrochloride compared with their reference caviteins. The 1 H NMR spectrum of NG2 was very similar to that of LG2, whereas there was a noticeable loss in the number and sharpness of the amide signals of NG3 compared with LG3. These data suggest that LG3 is very well packed; a loss in conformational specificity resulted from replacement of the leucine residues with norleucine residues. In contrast, the packing and dynamics of the hydrophobic core in LG2 were similar to those in NG2 (both more modest than LG3), as their 1 H NMR spectra were virtually indistinguishable. Overall, substitution of leucine by norleucine provided an efficient, convenient, and informative probe of the packing and dynamics of our caviteins' hydrophobic cores. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 90: 37–50, 2008. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".