AN EFFICIENT LOTOS-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR DESCRIBING AND SOLVING (TEMPORAL) CSPs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulation of complex Lotos specifications is not always efficient due to the space explosion problem of their corresponding transition systems. To overcome this difficulty in practice, we present in this paper a novel approach which integrates constraint propagation techniques into the Lotos specifications. These solving techniques are used to reduce the size of the search space before and during the search for a solution to a given combinatorial problem under constraints. In order to do that, we first tackle the challenging task of describing combinatorial problems in Lotos using the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) framework. In this regard, we provide two generic Lotos templates for describing CSPs and temporal CSPs (CSPs involving temporal constraints). To evaluate the time performance of the framework we propose, we have conducted several experimental tests on instances of the N-Queens, the machine scheduling and randomly generated CSPs. The results of these experiments are promising and demonstrate the efficiency of Lotos simulation when CSP techniques are integrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it