Two feeding-induced proteins from the male gonad trigger engorgement of the female tick <i>Amblyomma hebraeum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most female ixodid ticks, once mated, feed to repletion within 6-10 days. Previous studies indicate that an engorgement factor (EF), passed to the female during copulation, may be the stimulus for engorgement. Here, we show that extracts of the testis/vas deferens of fed (but not unfed) male Amblyomma hebraeum contain EF bioactivity when injected into the hemocoel of feeding virgins. We have produced recombinant proteins (recproteins) from 28 feeding-induced genes in the male gonad and have identified a recombinant A. hebraeum engorgement factor (recAhEF) among these recproteins. recAhEF is a combination of two peptides, recAhEFalpha (16.1 kDa) and recAhEFbeta (11.6 kDa), neither of which has bioactivity on its own. recAhEF also stimulates salivary gland degeneration and partial development of the ovary, suggesting that it may be the same material as another male gonadal protein from this tick, male factor. We propose the name "voraxin" for the natural EF of ticks. When normal mated females were put on a rabbit immunized against recAhEF, 74% failed to feed beyond one-tenth the normal engorged weight within 14 days whereas all mated ticks put on a control rabbit engorged normally (mean duration of 8.8 +/- 0.8 days). This result constitutes preliminary evidence that an anti-tick vaccine might be developed from voraxin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".